At a glance
- Many businesses make understandable mistakes when trying to determine their plant and machinery sums insured
- Setting the correct sum insured requires careful consideration of a number of factors, and a thorough knowledge of the policy terms
- We look at the factors to consider, how to set more accurate sums insured and avoid the dangers of underinsurance
This article counts towards accumulating your annual CII CPD structured learning hours for Underinsurance.
By reading this article, and correctly answering the three questions underneath, you will have achieved the following learning outcome: Summarise the importance of professional valuations in helping to prevent underinsurance.
Visit the CPD Hub to log in and begin accumulating CPD hours.
For businesses that rely on key equipment, underinsurance can have unexpected and severe consequences. Simply using the purchase cost for valuing assets is a mistake made by many, resulting in inaccurate sums insured and inadequate claim settlements.
Valuing assets for insurance purposes requires a particular methodology, so it is important to take care over your approach in order to avoid underinsurance.
How will the policy settle a claim?
The basis of settlement determines how an insurer will calculate a claim settlement. When setting the sum insured, different approaches must be taken, depending on which basis of settlement is specified.
Insurance policies can specify different bases of settlement. It is therefore essential that the applicable basis is known before valuing assets.
In the UK, either an indemnity or, more commonly, reinstatement basis is generally used for items of plant and machinery. Other bases of settlement do exist, such as an agreed value basis, but are less common for most customers’ purposes.
An indemnity basis reflects the traditional principle of insurance: to return the insured to their position prior to the loss – no more, no less.
An indemnity basis will cover either:
• Cost of repair, less an allowance for wear, tear, depreciation and all relevant forms of obsolescence
• Cost of a replacement with a similar machine, giving regard to its age and condition and all relevant forms of obsolescence
A settlement on this basis is therefore unlikely to fund the full cost of a new replacement asset, so customers should be particularly conscious of overstating sums insured.
The purchase cost should be avoided, as the value of plant and machinery can rapidly depreciate once in operation. A reasonable starting point is the current market value of the asset, taking into account age and condition.
Difficulty arises where a current market value is not easily determinable, particularly if the asset is no longer being produced or actively bought and sold.
Valuations for an indemnity basis can therefore be a difficult task for customers to undertake alone, and both under- and overinsurance are distinct risks.
Reinstatement is now the most common basis of settlement used in the UK insurance market. This basis departs from traditional principles, as a claim settlement will result in an improvement to the insured’s position.
Reinstatement will cover either:
• Cost of repair, with no deductions made for wear, tear, depreciation or other forms of obsolescence
• Cost of replacing the asset with a new item of similar type, capacity and utility (i.e. ‘new for old’)
The sum insured on a reinstatement basis should include the full cost of completely replacing an item of plant or machinery with a new item of similar type, capacity and utility. In addition to the purchase cost, this sum should include factors such as freight and installation costs.
If the item is readily available for purchase, then determining an appropriate sum insured should be relatively simple. However, difficulty arises if machinery is old or no longer in production. In those circumstances, the cost of an alternative piece of equipment of a similar nature and capacity must be identified.
Getting your sums right
Understanding the correct basis of settlement is very important in order too provide suitable sums insured.
The approach taken to valuations will produce quite different results, with reinstatement sums insured being notably higher than those on an indemnity basis. Approaching a valuation from the wrong starting point is likely to result in either over- or underinsurance.
Plant and machinery are also particularly susceptible to fluctuations in value, making it difficult for customers to establish an accurate sum insured.
To ensure your sums are accurate, there is no substitute for regular professional valuations to be undertaken by a qualified surveyor.
For more information on helping your customers set adequate sums insured, please speak with your local Zurich contact.
Find out more and access helpful guides and insight with our new Underinsurance, Fire and Flood Risk Resources.